Ron Heinrich , Instructor
B.Sc. University of Saskatchewan
Ph.D. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Vertebrate Morphology and Evolution
My research interests relate to the early evolution and diversification of the mammalian order Carnivora and to the way in which both fossil and living carnivores utilize their limbs during locomotion and associated behaviors (e.g. digging). An offshoot of this research has been an attempt to understand how the shape of long bones changes in response to increasing body mass during the lifetime of an animal, a field of study referred to as ontogenetic allometry.
Carnivora includes an extremely diverse array of mammals that vary considerably
in size, shape, and ecology. Besides cats and dogs the order includes
weasels, mongooses, raccoons, bears, hyaenas, and the marine-adapted seals
and walruses all of which evolved from a group of carnivorans, the miacoids,
that lived some 65-45 million years ago. The oldest known miacoid skeletons
appear in the fossil record about 55 million years ago and much of my work
to date has involved describing these fossils and comparing them to modern
mammals (Fig. 1) where we can correlate the size and shape of the bone
with specific behaviors. Using this comparative morphology approach we
are able to provide some interpretation of the extent to which these extinct
animals used their limbs for climbing, digging running, etc.
Figure 1. Comparison of the humeri of the fossil miacids Vulpavus
(A) and Didymictis (B)to the living carnivorans, the arboreal binturong
(C) and the wolf (D). Like the binturongVulpavus possesses a low
greater tubercle (gt) and well-developed lesser tubercle (lt) for attachment
of the rotator cuff muscles of the shoulder . Didymictis is more
similar to the wolf in these features and also possesses a supratrochelar
foramen (sf) characteristic of mammals that are adapted for terrestrial
speed rather than climbing although Didymicits possesses a well-developed
medial epicondyle (me) indicative of strong forearm flexors. From Heinrich
and Rose, 1997.
I have also employed a more biomechanical approach to understanding
the skeleton of fossil carnivorans, an approach that involves modeling
bones as beams and then analyses bone shape using basic engineering principles.
By comparing the amount and distribution of bone at different cross sections
along the length of particular long bones such as the humerus and femur
(Fig. 2), we can get some idea of the mechanical forces that acted on that
bone when the animal was alive. This has led to collaboration with
other researchers in studies that analyze the forces carnivorans exert
on the ground with their fore- and hindlimbs when walking and running.
I anticipate that these broader studies of mammalian locomotion will enable
me to describe more definitively the locomotor behaviors of extinct species.
Cross-sectional parameters have also provided an important means for estimating
body mass of fossils, and I have applied this technique to the early miacids.

Figure 2. Orientations and reference axes of the humerus (A) and femur (B) of a wolverine used to acquire cross-sectional data. From these cross sections (C and D respectively) parameters such as cortical area and moments of area can be calculated that provide information regarding axial and bending rigidity of the bone at that particular section. From Heinrich and Biknevicius, 1998.
Weishampel, D.B. and R.E. Heinrich. 1992. Systematics of the Hypsilophodontidae and Basal
Linnean Society, 108: 179-196.
Paleontology, 71: 1172-1178.
247:215-223.
Introductory Zoology Labs (Bios 171, 173)
Human Anatomy (Bios 301/302)
Advanced Human Anatomy (Bios 401)
Department of Biological Sciences
Ohio University
Athens, Ohio 45701
(740) 593 - 9485